The selection of medicinal materials as a root filler among bioactive sealer (review of literature)
This review article is aimed at selecting the best material available on the market. In dental practice, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), Biodentine (Septodont), and IRM (Dentsply) are often used. The main goal of endodontic treatment is to prevent or cure apical periodontitis and to control the infection. The filling material should not only prevent the ingress of pathogens and their waste products into the tooth cavity, but also contribute to the normal development of periodontal disease. One of their main properties are: impermeability to biological fluids, fast curing, biological inertness to the tissues of the body as a whole, x-ray contrast, low thermal conductivity, simplicity and ease of use, high adhesion and adaptability to the root canal. Therapy is a sequence of actions that include mechanical and chemical cleaning of microbial flora, formation, drug treatment and obturation. Preventive measures are traditionally carried out through the hole made in the crown of the affected tooth. In order for the sealing technique to be successful, a sealer (sealer) and filler (filler) are usually required, which is usually gutta-percha pins. The quality of care provided is largely determined by the correctly selected medical material that claims to have the best properties. Biodentine (Septodont) is a relatively new material on the market that corresponds to ProRoot MTA (Dentsply). The chemical composition, properties, and application of the selected materials were reviewed and compared. The review included a total of 8 review articles and 8 in vitro and in vivo studies.
Orlova S.E., Ivanova V.A., Arykhova L.K., Borisov V.V. 2020. The selection of medicinal materials as a root filler among bioactive sealer (review of literature). Challenges in Modern Medicine. 43 (4): 582–589 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18413/2687-0940-2020-43-4-582-589
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Bekmuradov B.A., Dzhuraeva Sh.F. 2013. Sovremennye materialy i metody obturacii sistemy kornevyh kanalov zubov [Modern Materials and methods of Obturation Of the root Canal system of Teeth]. Vestnik Avicenny, 6: ijul'-sentjabr', 2013 g.
Ivashhenko V.A., Adamchik A.A. 2018. Jeffektivnost' primenenija sovremennyh materialov pri biologicheskom metode lechenija jeksperimental'nogo pul'pita [Efficiency of using modern materials in the biological treatment of experimental pulpitis]. Rossijskij Stomatologicheskij Zhurnal, 22 (6).
Tarasenko S.V., Grigor'janc L.A., Gor I.A., Medvedeva I.V., Pogosjan G.R. 2018. Analiz antibakterial'nogo dejstvija plombirovochnyh materialov dlja postojannoj obturacii kanalov [Analysis of the antibacterial effect of filling materials for permanent channel obturation]. Rossijskij Stomatologicheskij Zhurnal, 22 (5).
Habadze Z.S., Zorjan A.V., Magaj V.E., Iljushina A.I., Magomedov O.I., Kakabadze N.M., Abazjan M.D. 2019. BiodentineTM Ili MTA ProRootTM: Sravnitel'nyj analiz primenenija v jendodonticheskoj praktike [BiodentineTM Or MTA Proroot: Comparative analysis Of application in Endodontic Practice]. Jendodontija Today; 47–53.
Akhavan Zanjani V., Tabari K., Sheikh-Al-Eslamian S.M., Abrandabadi A.N. 2017. Physiochemical Properties of Experimental Nano-Hybrid MTA. Journal of Medicine and Life, 182–87.
Bolhari Behnam, Kazem Ashofteh Yazdi, Farnood Sharifi, Salma Pirmoazen. 2015. Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Marginal Adaptation of Four Root-End Filling Materials in Presence and Absence of Blood. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 226–34.
Chong B.S., Pitt Ford T.R., Hudson M.B. 2009. A Prospective Clinical Study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM When Used as Root-End Filling Materials in Endodontic Surgery. International Endodontic Journal, 502–6.
Fabricio Guerrero and Berástegui Esther. 2018. Porosity Analysis of MTA and Biodentine Cements for Use in Endodontics by Using Micro-Computed Tomography. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry.
Grech L., Mallia B., Camilleri J. 2013. Characterization of Set Intermediate Restorative Material, Biodentine, Bioaggregate and a Prototype Calcium Silicate Cement for Use as Root-End Filling Materials. International Endodontic Journal, 623–41.
Han L., Okiji T. 2011. Uptake of Calcium and Silicon Released from Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Materials into Root Canal Dentine. International Endodontic Journal, 1081–87.
Ivanova E.V., Shamkhalov G.S., Dmitrieva N.A., Akhmedova Z.R. 2014. Specific Features of Materials for Initial Pulpitis Treatment. Stomatologia, 281–84.
Kaur M., Singh H., Dhillon J.S., Batra M., Saini M. 2017. MTA versus Biodentine: Review of Literature with a Comparative Analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research.
Lindeboom Jerome A.H., Frenken Joost W.F.H., Kroon Frans H.M., Hans P. van den Akker. 2005. A Comparative Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of MTA and IRM as Root-End Filling Materials in Single-Rooted Teeth in Endodontic Surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 495–500.
Malhotra Sakshi, Mithra N. Hegde. 2015. Analysis of Marginal Seal of ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus Biodentine, and Glass Ionomer Cement as Root-End Filling Materials: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Oral Research and Review, 44–49.
Malkondu Özlem, Meriç Karapinar Kazandaǧ, Ender Kazazoǧlu. 2014. A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and Repair Material. BioMed Research International.
Mozayeni Mohammad Ali, Amin Salem Milani, Laleh Alim Marvasti, Fatemeh Mashadi Abbas and Seyed Jalil Modaresi. 2009. Cytotoxicity of Cold Ceramic Compared with MTA and IRM. Iranian Endodontic Journal, 106–11.
Nabeel Mohamed, Hossam M. Tawfik, Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida, Abeer A. Elgendy. 2019. Sealing Ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Root-End Filling Materials. Saudi Dental Journal, 16–22.
Nikhil Vineeta, Molly Madan, Charu Agarwal, Navleen Suri. 2014. Effect of Addition of 2 % Chlorhexidine or 10 % Doxycycline on Antimicrobial Activity of Biodentine. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 271–75.
Sarkar N.K., Caicedo R., Ritwik P., Moiseyeva R., Kawashima I. 2005. Physicochemical Basis of the Biologic Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. Journal of Endodontics, 97–100.
Sawyer Allen N., Sergey Y. Nikonov, Alaina K. Pancio, Li Na Niu, Kelli A. Agee, Robert J. Loushine, Roger N. Weller, David H. Pashley and Franklin R. Tay. 2012. Effects of Calcium Silicate-Based Materials on the Flexural Properties of Dentin. Journal of Endodontics, 603–6.
Shamkhalov G.S., Ivanova E.V., Dmitrieva N.A., Akhmedova Z.R. 2013. Comparative Study of Antimicrobial Activity of «Biodentin» and «Rootdent» Cements and «Futurabond NR» Adhesive. Stomatologia, 37–39.
De Souza, Erika Thuanne Gonçalves, Michele Dias Nunes Tameirão, Juliana Marins Roter, Joaquim Teixeira De Assis, Aline De Almeida Neves and Gustavo André De-Deus. 2013. Tridimensional Quantitative Porosity Characterization of Three Set Calcium Silicate-Based Repair Cements for Endodontic Use. Microscopy Research and Technique, 1450–57.