Clinical studies feature immediate implantation and immediate load using HUMANA DENTAL implant system
This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of electronic and energy-dispersing X-ray spectroscopy to identify the optimal indicators of the surface structure of dental implants of different systems, which can ensure the stability, osteointegration and success of dental implantation. As a result of the study of the innovative surface, HSTТМ received a rough, unique, structured, and clean surface that meets the international criteria of ISIS and is devoid of the identified flaws of the surfaces of SLA and RBM. Clinical studies of immediate dental implantation and immediate load using surface implants, HSTТМ. In 104 patients, positive effects of surface quality characteristics were found to be positive. for primary stability, osteointegration, implant success and was a prerequisite for recommending the use of Humana Dental implant system in direct implantation with subsequent load.
Grishin P.O., Kalinnikova E.A., Simahov R.V. 2020. Clinical studies feature immediate implantation and immediate load using HUMANA DENTAL implant system. Challenges in Modern Medicine, 43 (4): 560–572 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18413/2687-0940-2020-43-4-560-572
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Vinnikov L.I., Savranskij F.Z., Simahov R.V., Grishin P.O. 2015. Sravnitel'naja ocenka poverhnostej implantatov, obrabotannyh tehnologijami SLA, RBM i Clean& Porous [Comparative evaluation of implant surfaces treated with SLA, RBM and Clean & Porous technologies]. Sovremennaja stomatologija. 2: 104–108.
Zekij A.O., Shirokov. A.A. 2016. Issledovanie struktury vzaimodejstvij v sisteme «implantat – kost'» [Study of the structure of interactions in the «implant – bone» system]. Vestnik medicinskih tehnologij. 23 (4): 18–23.
Maruhno B.B., Vahnenko A.I. 2012. Izuchenie poverhnosti implantatov razlichnyh system [Study of the surface of implants of various systems]. Sovremennaja stomatologija. 4: 106–109.
Fawad Javed, Hameeda Bashir Ahmed, Roberto Crespi, Georgios E. Romanos. 2013. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interventional Medicine and Applied Science. 5 (4): 162–167.
Mariano Herrero-Climent, Manuel M. Romero-Ruiz, Pedro Lazaro Calvo, José Vicente Ríos Santos, Roman A. Perez, Francisco Javier Gil Mur. 2018. Effectiveness of new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs. Clin. Oral Investng. 22 (3): 1423–1432.
Antonello Falco, Marco Berardini, Paolo Trisi. 2018. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 33 (4): 824–830.
Polsani Laxman Rao, Amreena Gill. 2012. Primary stability: The password of integration. Review article. 2: 103–109.
Zita Gomes R., de Vanconcelos M.R., Lopes Guera Im., de Almedia A.B., de Campos Felino C. 2017. Implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a controlled trial. Biomed. Res. Int. 10: 165–172.
Tomas Albrektsson, Ann Wennerberg. 2019. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clinical implant Dentistry. 21 (51): 4–7.
Pozzi A., Tallarico M., Moy P.K. 2015. Immediate loading with a novel implant featured by variable-threaded geometry internal conical connection and platform shifting: three- years results from a prospective cohort study. Eur. Oral Implantol. 8 (1): 51–63.
Macary C., Menhall A., Zammarie C., Lombardi T., Lee S.Y., Stacchi C., Park K.B. 2019. Primary stability optimization by using fixtures with different thread depth loading implants. Material. (Basel). 27 (12): 398–411.
Luiz Carlos do Carmo Filho, Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado, Eduardo Dickie de Castilhos. 2018. Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Oral Research. 32 (25): 175–189.
Rupp F., Liang L., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Schideir I., Huttin F. 2018. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dental Mater. 3: 40–57.
Rittel D., Dorogoy A., Shemtov-Yona K. 2018. Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implants pullout torque removal tests. Clinical Implants Dentistry and Relate Research. 86 (2051): 713–720.
Cheng B., Niu Q., Cui Y., Jiang W., Zhao Y., Kong L. 2017. Effects of different hierarchical hybrid micro-nanostructure surface on implant osseointegration. Clin. Implant. Dent. Res. 19: 539–595.
Fabbro M.D., Tasscieri S., Canciani F., Addis A. 2017. Osseointegration of titanium implants with different rough surface: histologic and histomorphometric study in adult minipig model. Implant. Dent. 28: 357–366.
Bilhan H., Geckili O., Mumcu E., Bozdag E., Sunbu E., Log Lu. 2010. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. Oral Rehabil. 37 (12): 900–907.
Manuel M. Romero-Ruiz, Francisco Javier Gil-Mur, José Vicente Ríos-Santos, Pedro Lázaro-Calvo, Blanca Ríos-Carrasco, Mariano Herrero-Climent. 2019. Influence of a novel surface of bioactive implants on osseointegration: a comparative and histomorphometric corellation and implant stability study in minipigs. Int. J. Mol. 20 (9): 2307–2315.
Zhou W., Kuderer S., Liu Z., Uim S. 2017. Peri-implant bone remodeling at the interface of three different implant types: a histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin. Oral Implant. 28: 1143–1149.
Mello C.C., Lemos S.A., Verri F.R., Dos Satos D.M., Goato M.C., Pellizer E.P. 2017. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Stpt. 46 (9): 1162–1177.
Salerno M., Itri A., Frezzato M., Rebaudi A. 2015. A surface microstructure dental implants before and after insertion: An in vitro study by means of scanning probe microscopy. Implant. Dent. 24: 248–255.
Naves M.M., Menezes H.H., Magalhaes D. 2015. Effect of microgeometry on the surface topography of dental implants. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 30 (4): 789–799.