<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2687-0940</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Challenges in modern medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0940</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2687-0940-2020-43-3-412-423</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">41</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>STOMATOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Analysis of results of retention in patients, who passes orthodontic treatment on the non-removable equipment</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Analysis of results of retention in patients, who passes orthodontic treatment on the non-removable equipment</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kuznecova</surname><given-names>Marija J.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuznecova</surname><given-names>Marija J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sevbitov</surname><given-names>Andrej V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sevbitov</surname><given-names>Andrej V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Dorofeev</surname><given-names>Aleksej E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dorofeev</surname><given-names>Aleksej E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Domashkevich</surname><given-names>Nikolaj S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Domashkevich</surname><given-names>Nikolaj S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Mikheev</surname><given-names>Denis S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mikheev</surname><given-names>Denis S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/journal-medicine/2020/3/412-423.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Currently, the development of modern techniques and methods of treatment applied in the practice of orthodontic dentistry, usually allows to solve the most complex clinical cases. Modern&amp;nbsp;diagnostic methods allow to do accurate calculations and plan the course of orthodontic treatment, and foresee in advance the optimal patient management tactics. However, the issue of retaining the results of orthodontic treatment remains not fully understood. The various methods and approaches of using removable and non-removable retainers doesn&amp;#39;t clarify the opinion about the efficiency of each individual retainer. In order to assess the effectiveness of various retainers, the study was conducted on the efficiency of retaining the results of orthodontic treatment in patients of different age groups, depending on the type of retainer. The research methodology consisted of evaluating teleradiography data, analyzing plaster models of jaws, collecting gingival fluid and determining immune and inflammatory parameters of periodontium, as well as questioning 246 patients aged from 12 to 38 years about the convenience of using the retainer. The results of the work, obtained on the basis of the investigated data, made it clear that the most functionally effective retention method, was a combined method using a removable retention mouthguard and a non-removable nitinol wire retainer. According to the patients assessment, the most convenient retainer to use was the removable retention mouthguard.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Currently, the development of modern techniques and methods of treatment applied in the practice of orthodontic dentistry, usually allows to solve the most complex clinical cases. Modern&amp;nbsp;diagnostic methods allow to do accurate calculations and plan the course of orthodontic treatment, and foresee in advance the optimal patient management tactics. However, the issue of retaining the results of orthodontic treatment remains not fully understood. The various methods and approaches of using removable and non-removable retainers doesn&amp;#39;t clarify the opinion about the efficiency of each individual retainer. In order to assess the effectiveness of various retainers, the study was conducted on the efficiency of retaining the results of orthodontic treatment in patients of different age groups, depending on the type of retainer. The research methodology consisted of evaluating teleradiography data, analyzing plaster models of jaws, collecting gingival fluid and determining immune and inflammatory parameters of periodontium, as well as questioning 246 patients aged from 12 to 38 years about the convenience of using the retainer. The results of the work, obtained on the basis of the investigated data, made it clear that the most functionally effective retention method, was a combined method using a removable retention mouthguard and a non-removable nitinol wire retainer. According to the patients assessment, the most convenient retainer to use was the removable retention mouthguard.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>orthodontics</kwd><kwd>orthodontic treatment</kwd><kwd>retention of the results of orthodontic treatment</kwd><kwd>mouthguards</kwd><kwd>retainers</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>orthodontics</kwd><kwd>orthodontic treatment</kwd><kwd>retention of the results of orthodontic treatment</kwd><kwd>mouthguards</kwd><kwd>retainers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Abzaeva A.A. 2017. Optimizacija vybora retencionnyh apparatov posle ortodonticheskogo lechenija [Optimization of the selection of retention after orthodontic treatment apparatus]. Bjulleten&amp;#39; medicinskih Internet-konferencij, 7 (9): 1407&amp;ndash;1409.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Alimova M.Ja. 2009. Ortodonticheskie retencionnye apparaty [Orthodontic retention devices]. M., MEDpress-inform, 72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Arutjunov S.D., Bulgakova D.M., Grishkina M.G. 2013. Zuboproteznaja tehnika [Dental technology]. M., GJeOTAR-Media, 384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Asambaeva D.Je., Ergazina M.Zh., Fedotovskih G.V. 2007. Sposob vzjatija i obrabotki citologicheskogo materiala iz desnevoj borozdki (karmana) dlja identifikacii kletochnyh jelementov desnevoj zhidkosti [Method for taking and processing cytological material from the gingival groove (pocket) to identify the cellular elements of the gingival fluid]. Patent RF № 18365.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Belousov A.V., Jakushenko S.V. 2009. Sposob zabora desnevoj zhidkosti [Method for collecting gingival fluid]. Patent RF № 2342956. Bjul. 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bragin E.A., Vakushina E.A., Grigorenko P.A. Obosnovanie primeneniya sovremennykh nes&amp;quot;emnykh retentsionnykh apparatov posle ortodonticheskogo lecheniya tekhnikoi pryamoi dugi [Substantiation of the use of modern fixed retention devices after orthodontic treatment using the straight arch technique]. Metod. rekom. Stavropol, SGMA, 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Degtyarev V.P. 2015. Normal&amp;#39;naya fiziologiya s kursom fiziologii chelyustno-litsevoi oblasti [Normal physiology with a course of physiology of the maxillofacial region]. M., GEOTAR-Media, 848.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Zheleznyj P.A., Rusakova E.Ju., Shhelkunov K.S., Apraksina E.Ju., Dudlenko A.A., Pushilin P.I., Akimova S.E., Korts A.F., Sartakova I.M., Sergeeva I.L. 2013. Sostojanie faktorov mestnogo immuniteta polosti rta v processe kompleksnogo ortodonticheskogo lechenija [The state of local immunity factors in oral cavity during integrated orthodontic care]. Tihookeanskij medicinskij zhurnal, (1): 26&amp;ndash;28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kuznecova M.Ju., Mitin N.E., David&amp;#39;janc A.A., Kalinovskij S.I., Kuznecov I.I. 2019. Sravnitel&amp;#39;naja harakteristika metodov zabora desnevoj zhidkosti dlja ocenki rezul&amp;#39;tatov ortodonticheskogo lechenija [Comparative characteristics of methods of gingival fluid intake to assess the orthodontic treatment results]. Mediko-farmacevticheskij zhurnal &amp;laquo;Pul&amp;#39;s&amp;raquo;, 21 (7): 37&amp;ndash;41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Levenets A.A., Bril&amp;#39; E.A., Kozhevnikova T.A. 2005. Sostoyanie sistemy immuniteta u deteĭ na etapakh ortodonticheskogo lecheniya [The state of the immune system in children at the stages of orthodontic treatment]. Institut stomatologii, 28 (3): 44&amp;ndash;45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Medvedeva T.V. 2013. Retencionnyj period ortodonticheskogo lechenija [Retention period of orthodontic treatment]. Vestnik Klinicheskoi bol&amp;#39;nitsy № 51, 41&amp;ndash;43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Mitin N.E., Kalinovskii S.I., Sevbitov A.V. Kuznetsova M.A., Shatailo M.K., Volkova V.V. 2019. Ustrojstvo dlja zabora desnevoj zhidkosti [Gingival fluid collection device]. Patent RF № 190173. Bull. 18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Mitin N.E., Rodina T.S., Grishin M.I., Vasil&amp;#39;eva T.A. 2016. Psihologicheskaja adaptacija pacientov na stomatologicheskom prieme [Psychological adaptation of the patient to the dental reception]. V mire nauchnyh otkrytij, 83 (11): 115&amp;ndash;119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Persin L.S. 2015. Ortodontiya. Diagnostika i lechenie zubochelyustno-litsevykh anomalii i deformatsii: uchebnik [Orthodontics. Diagnosis and treatment of dento-maxillofacial anomalies and deformities: textbook]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media, 640.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Persin L.S. 1998. Ortodontiya. Lechenie zubochelyustnykh anomalii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Orthodontics. Treatment of dentoalveolar anomalies. Textbook for universities]. Moscow, Scientific Publishing Center &amp;laquo;Engineer&amp;raquo;, 297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Shhelkunov K.S., Shhelkunova O.A. 2015. Osobennosti izmenenija immunnogo statusa rotovoj zhidkosti pri ortodonticheskom lechenii [Features of immune status changing of stomatic liquid at orthodontic treatment]. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences, 21 (1): 21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Littelwood S.J., Millett D.T., Doubleday B., Beam D.R. 2006. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. Journal of Orthodontics, 33 (3): 205&amp;ndash;212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Platonova V.V., Nevdakh A.S., Kuznetsova M.Yu., Sevbitov A.V., Mironov S.N., Borisov V.V., Danshina S.D. 2018. Frequency of traumatic complications of orthodontic treatment depending on type of braces which are used. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5 (1): 141&amp;ndash;143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Scannapieco F.A. 1999. Association of periodontal infections with atherosclerotic and pulmonary diseases. Journal of Periodontal Research, 34 (7): 340&amp;ndash;445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Sevbitov A.V., Mitin N.E., Kuznetsova M.Yu., Tikhonov V.E., Kamenskov P.E., Kuznetsov I.I. 2019. Determination of the psychoemotional status of the patients depending on the anomalies of teeth position and bite. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6 (3): 5710&amp;ndash;5713.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Vardimon A.D., Robbins D., Brosh T. 2010. In-vivo von Mises strains during Invisalign treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 138 (4): 399&amp;ndash;409.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Wick Alexander R.G., Gary A. 1986. The Alexander discipline: contemporary concepts and philosophies. Ormco Corp., 461.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>