<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2687-0940</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Challenges in modern medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0940</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52575/2687-0940-2025-48-3-399-410</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">260</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SURGERY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;X-ray Surgical Correction of Strictures of Biliodigestial Anastomosis Complicated by Cholelithiasis&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;X-ray Surgical Correction of Strictures of Biliodigestial Anastomosis Complicated by Cholelithiasis&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Okhotnikov</surname><given-names>Oleg I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Okhotnikov</surname><given-names>Oleg I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>oleg_okhotnikov@mail.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Yakovleva</surname><given-names>Marina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Yakovleva</surname><given-names>Marina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Okhotnikov</surname><given-names>Oleg O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Okhotnikov</surname><given-names>Oleg O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/journal-medicine/2025/3/АПМ_2025_Том_48__3_399-410.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The risk of developing a stricture of the formed biliodigestive anastomosis is estimated in the range from 4.1&amp;nbsp;% to 69&amp;nbsp;% and the formation period from 11 to 30 months. Endoscopic techniques (incision, balloon
&amp;nbsp;

dilation, stenting) form the basis of the modern approach to the treatment of benign strictures of biliary anastomoses. If endoscopic assistance is unsuccessful or impossible, percutaneous X-ray surgical techniques of internal or external biliary drainage, balloon dilation and stenting are used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, immediate efficacy and risk of recurrence of biliodigestive anastomosis stricture during its antegrade X-ray surgical correction with resolution of concomitant cholelithiasis. The study group included 16 patients with biliodigestive anastomotic strictures complicated by cholelithiasis. The control group included 42 patients with biliodigestive anastomotic strictures without concomitant cholelithiasis. The patients underwent antegrade balloon reconstruction of the stricture with drainage being brought down beyond the anastomosis zone and retained as a stent for at least 9&amp;nbsp;months. During the observation period (up to five years), recurrence of stricture requiring repeated X-ray surgical intervention occurred in five cases (11.9&amp;nbsp;%) in the control group (n = 42) and in 9 cases (56.3&amp;nbsp;%) in the study group (n&amp;nbsp;= 16). To assess the reliability of differences in the treatment results of patients in both groups, nonparametric statistics methods were used. The risk of stricture recurrence during five years of observation in patients with concomitant cholelithiasis was significantly higher. Percutaneous transhepatic removal of cholelithiasis associated with scar stricture of the biliodigestive anastomosis using the technique of antegrade contact lithotripsy and lithoextraction is justified and has virtually no alternative, primarily in patients with high surgical and anesthetic risk.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The risk of developing a stricture of the formed biliodigestive anastomosis is estimated in the range from 4.1&amp;nbsp;% to 69&amp;nbsp;% and the formation period from 11 to 30 months. Endoscopic techniques (incision, balloon
&amp;nbsp;

dilation, stenting) form the basis of the modern approach to the treatment of benign strictures of biliary anastomoses. If endoscopic assistance is unsuccessful or impossible, percutaneous X-ray surgical techniques of internal or external biliary drainage, balloon dilation and stenting are used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, immediate efficacy and risk of recurrence of biliodigestive anastomosis stricture during its antegrade X-ray surgical correction with resolution of concomitant cholelithiasis. The study group included 16 patients with biliodigestive anastomotic strictures complicated by cholelithiasis. The control group included 42 patients with biliodigestive anastomotic strictures without concomitant cholelithiasis. The patients underwent antegrade balloon reconstruction of the stricture with drainage being brought down beyond the anastomosis zone and retained as a stent for at least 9&amp;nbsp;months. During the observation period (up to five years), recurrence of stricture requiring repeated X-ray surgical intervention occurred in five cases (11.9&amp;nbsp;%) in the control group (n = 42) and in 9 cases (56.3&amp;nbsp;%) in the study group (n&amp;nbsp;= 16). To assess the reliability of differences in the treatment results of patients in both groups, nonparametric statistics methods were used. The risk of stricture recurrence during five years of observation in patients with concomitant cholelithiasis was significantly higher. Percutaneous transhepatic removal of cholelithiasis associated with scar stricture of the biliodigestive anastomosis using the technique of antegrade contact lithotripsy and lithoextraction is justified and has virtually no alternative, primarily in patients with high surgical and anesthetic risk.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>biliodigestive anastomosis</kwd><kwd>anastomotic scar stricture</kwd><kwd>balloon dilation of stricture</kwd><kwd>cholelithiasis</kwd><kwd>antegrade external-internal drainage of the biliary tree</kwd><kwd>antegrade lithotripsy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>biliodigestive anastomosis</kwd><kwd>anastomotic scar stricture</kwd><kwd>balloon dilation of stricture</kwd><kwd>cholelithiasis</kwd><kwd>antegrade external-internal drainage of the biliary tree</kwd><kwd>antegrade lithotripsy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Kulezneva Yu.V., Kurmanseitova L.I., Patrushev I.V., Efanov M.G., Tsvirkun V.V., Melekhina O.V., Shapovalyants S.G., Fedorov E.D., Budzinsky S.A., Shcheglov V.V., Belyakov R.F., Petrovsky A.N., Popov A.Yu., Sidorenko A.B., Bagmet N.N., Trifonov S.A., Sutyagin A.A., Gadaev Sh.Sh., Konysov&amp;nbsp;M.N., Khisteva K.N., Chitadze A.A., Musatov A.B. Experience in Creation of Database (Registry) of Patients with Posttraumatic Cicatrical Biliary Strictures. First Results. 2021. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 26(4): 105&amp;ndash;113 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2021-4-105-113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Ashat M., Berei J., El-Abiad R., Khashab M.A. 2024. Benign Biliary Strictures: A Comprehensive Review. Turk. J. Gastroenterol, 35(7): 513&amp;ndash;522. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.24044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Chikamori F., Shimizu S., Ito S., Okazaki M., Tanida N., Sharma N. 2022. Percutaneous Stone Removal Using Cobra-Shaped Sheath and Cholangioscopy for Multiple Hepatolithiasis with Choledochoduodenal Anastomotic Stenosis. Radiol Case Rep, 17(6): 1890&amp;ndash;1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Choi K.K.H., Bonnichsen M., Liu K., Massey S., Staudenmann D., Saxena P., Kaffes A.J. 2023. Outcomes of Patients with Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomotic Strictures Undergoing Endoscopic and Percutaneous Treatment. Endosc. Int. Open, 11(1): E24-E31. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1952-2135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Colombo M., Forcignan&amp;ograve; E., Da Rio L., Spadaccini M., Andreozzi M., Giacchetto C.M., Carrara S., Maselli&amp;nbsp;R., Galtieri P.A., Pellegatta G., Capogreco A., Massimi D., Khalaf K., Hassan C., Anderloni A., Repici A., Fugazza A. 2023. Endoscopic Management of Benign Biliary Strictures: Looking for the Best Stent to Place. World J. Clin. Cases, 11(31): 7521&amp;ndash;7529. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Fan Z., Zhao X., Ji R., Li J., Shi Y. 2022. Endoscopic Treatment of Benign Biliary Stricture Using Different Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne, 17(1): 35&amp;ndash;60. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.108418</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Fang A., Kim I.K., Ukeh I., Etezadi V., Kim H.S. 2021. Percutaneous Management of Benign Biliary Strictures. Semin. Intervent. Radiol., 38(3): 291&amp;ndash;299. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Giuliante F., Panettieri E., De Rose A. M., Murazio M., Vellone M., Mele C., Clemente G., Giovannini I., Nuzzo&amp;nbsp;G., Ardito F. 2023. Bile Duct Injury After Cholecystectomy: Timing of Surgical Repair Should Be Based on Clinical Presentation. The Experience of a Tertiary Referral Center with Hepp-Couinaud Hepatico-Jejunostomy. Updates in surgery, 75(6): 1509&amp;ndash;1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01611-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Li T.F., Fu P.J., Han X.W., Ma J., Zhu M., Li Z., Ren J.Z. 2020. Repeated Balloon Dilatation with Long-Term Biliary Drainage for Treatment of Benign Biliary-Enteric Anastomosis Strictures: A STROBE-Compliant Article. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(44): e22741. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022741</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Mie T., Sasaki T., Okamoto T., Takeda T., Mori C., Yamada Y., Furukawa T., Kasuga A., Matsuyama M., Ozaka M., Sasahira N. 2024. Risk Factors for Recurrent Stenosis After Balloon Dilation for Benign Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomotic Stricture. Clin. Endosc., 57(2): 253&amp;ndash;262. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Nagai K., Mukai S., Abe M., Sofuni A., Tsuchiya T., Tanaka R., Tonozuka R., Yamamoto K., Matsunami Y., Kojima H., Minami H., Asano K., Itoi T. 2024. Long-Term Outcomes After EUS-guided Antegrade Intervention for Benign Bilioenteric Anastomotic Stricture. Gastrointest. Endosc., 99(1): 50&amp;ndash;60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Nagakawa Y., Kozono S., Takishita C., Osakabe H., Nishino H., Nakagawa N., Suzuki K., Hayashi Y., Ishizaki&amp;nbsp;T., Katsumata K., Tsuchida A. 2021. Incidence of Anastomotic Stricture After Hepaticojejunostomy with Continuous Sutures in Patients who Underwent Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Today, 51(7): 1212&amp;ndash;1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02223-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Nunes T.F., Inchingolo R., Morais N.R., Tibana T.K., Fornazari V.A.V., da Motta-Leal-Filho J.M., Spiliopoulos S. 2022. Long-Term Results of Oversized Balloon Dilation for Benign Anastomotic Biliary Strictures: Initial Two-Center Experience. Radiol. Bras., 55(2): 90&amp;ndash;96. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Raafat M., Morsy M.M., Mohamed S.I., Hamad M.A., Sayed M.M. 2023. Hepaticojejunostomy with Gastric Access Loop Versus Conventional Hepaticojejunostomy: A Randomized Trial. Updates Surg., 75(8): 2157&amp;ndash;2167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01604-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Sato T., Kogure H., Nakai Y., Kanai S., Ishigaki K.., Hakuta R., Saito K., Saito T., Takahara N., Hamada T., Mizuno S., Yamada A., Isayama H., Koike K. 2021. Endoscopic Treatment of Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomotic Strictures Using Fully-Covered Metal Stents. Dig. Endosc, 33(3): 451&amp;ndash;457. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13773</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Sato T., Nakai Y., Fujishiro M. 2022. Current Endoscopic Approaches to Biliary Strictures. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol, 38(5): 450&amp;ndash;460. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Schreuder A.M., Busch O.R., Besselink M.G., Ignatavicius P., Gulbinas A., Barauskas G., Gouma D.J. van Gulik T.M. 2020. Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury. Digestive surgery, 37(1): 10&amp;ndash;21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Suzuki Y., Yoshida M., Fujisawa T., Shimatani M., Tsuyuguchi T., Mori T., Tazuma S., Isayama H., Tanaka&amp;nbsp;A. 2024. Assessing Outcomes and Complications of Secondary Hepatolithiasis After Choledochoenterostomy: A Nationwide Survey in Japan. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci., 31(10): 716&amp;ndash;725. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Ye P., Zeng Q., Miao H., Pang H., Chen Y. 2021. Percutaneous Treatment of Benign Biliary Anastomotic Strictures: Retrievable Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with Fixation String Versus Large-Bore Catheters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 32(1): 113&amp;ndash;120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Yung K. K., Jin Y. C., Hwan L. J., Lee C.H. 2024. Percutaneous Treatment of Bilioenteric Anastomotic Strictures: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Temporary Covered Stents and Balloon Dilation. Eur. J. Radiol., 181: 111816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111816</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>