<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2687-0940</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Challenges in modern medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0940</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52575/2687-0940-2025-48-2-194-203</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">242</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>STOMATOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative Characteristics of the Properties of Polymer Materials Used for Manufacturing Temporary Dentures&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative Characteristics of the Properties of Polymer Materials Used for Manufacturing Temporary Dentures&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Vokulova</surname><given-names>Yuliya A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vokulova</surname><given-names>Yuliya A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vokulova.yulya@yandex.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Zhulev</surname><given-names>Evgenij N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhulev</surname><given-names>Evgenij N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Nikolaeva</surname><given-names>Elena Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikolaeva</surname><given-names>Elena Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Velmakina</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Velmakina</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Yanova</surname><given-names>Nina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Yanova</surname><given-names>Nina A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bragina</surname><given-names>Olga M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bragina</surname><given-names>Olga M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/journal-medicine/2025/2/АПМ_2025_Том_48__2_194-203.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The study was aimed at providing a comparative characterization of the properties of polymer materials used for manufacturing provisional fixed dentures applying traditional and digital methods. Water absorption and solubility of the materials were assessed. The experimental samples for the study were made of self-hardening cold-polymerized plastic based on polymethylmethacrylate Re-Fine Bright, a chemical-cured bisacrylic composite material Protemp 4, composite blocks made of acrylate polymer for Vita CAD-Temp CAD/CAM systems, and photopolymer resin for the NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH 3D printer. The study was conducted in accordance with GOST 56924-2016 &amp;quot;Polymer reducing materials&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; Statistical analysis was performed using the Kraskel-Wallis and Mann-Whitney H-test. It was found that for the Re-Fine Bright material, the average water absorption was 14.94 &amp;plusmn; 0.2748 micrograms/mm3, and solubility equaled 0.56 &amp;plusmn; 0.1949 micrograms/mm3, for Protemp 4, the average water absorption was 9.259 &amp;plusmn; 0.1719 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.46&amp;nbsp;&amp;plusmn;&amp;nbsp;0.1673&amp;nbsp;micrograms/mm3, for Vita CAD&amp;ndash;Temp, the average the value of water absorption equaled 9.649&amp;nbsp;&amp;plusmn; 0.2305 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.36 &amp;plusmn; 0.1517 micrograms/mm3, for NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH, the average value of water absorption was 21.69 &amp;plusmn; 0.1259 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.4 &amp;plusmn; 0.2121 micrograms/mm3. The study allows us to conclude that the groups of materials studied are indistinguishable on the basis of the &amp;quot;Solubility&amp;quot; criterion and distinguishable on the basis of the &amp;quot;Water absorption&amp;quot; criterion with a significance level of p &amp;lt; 0.01. There were no statistical differences in the criterion of &amp;quot;Water absorption&amp;quot; between Vita CAD-Temp material, Re-Fine Bright plastic and Protemp 4 material. The water absorption rates for Protemp 4 were significantly lower compared to the ReFine Bright plastic (the median samples differ by 37,4 %, p &amp;lt; 0,0083). The samples made of photopolymer resin for the NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH 3D printer had the highest water absorption value (the median of the sample was greater than the median of the groups &amp;quot;Protemp 4&amp;quot; by 61.1 %, that of &amp;quot;ReFine Bright&amp;quot; by 37.7&amp;nbsp;%, and that of &amp;quot;Vita CAD-Temp&amp;quot; by 51.8 %, p &amp;lt; 0.0083).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The study was aimed at providing a comparative characterization of the properties of polymer materials used for manufacturing provisional fixed dentures applying traditional and digital methods. Water absorption and solubility of the materials were assessed. The experimental samples for the study were made of self-hardening cold-polymerized plastic based on polymethylmethacrylate Re-Fine Bright, a chemical-cured bisacrylic composite material Protemp 4, composite blocks made of acrylate polymer for Vita CAD-Temp CAD/CAM systems, and photopolymer resin for the NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH 3D printer. The study was conducted in accordance with GOST 56924-2016 &amp;quot;Polymer reducing materials&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; Statistical analysis was performed using the Kraskel-Wallis and Mann-Whitney H-test. It was found that for the Re-Fine Bright material, the average water absorption was 14.94 &amp;plusmn; 0.2748 micrograms/mm3, and solubility equaled 0.56 &amp;plusmn; 0.1949 micrograms/mm3, for Protemp 4, the average water absorption was 9.259 &amp;plusmn; 0.1719 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.46&amp;nbsp;&amp;plusmn;&amp;nbsp;0.1673&amp;nbsp;micrograms/mm3, for Vita CAD&amp;ndash;Temp, the average the value of water absorption equaled 9.649&amp;nbsp;&amp;plusmn; 0.2305 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.36 &amp;plusmn; 0.1517 micrograms/mm3, for NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH, the average value of water absorption was 21.69 &amp;plusmn; 0.1259 micrograms/mm3, solubility was 0.4 &amp;plusmn; 0.2121 micrograms/mm3. The study allows us to conclude that the groups of materials studied are indistinguishable on the basis of the &amp;quot;Solubility&amp;quot; criterion and distinguishable on the basis of the &amp;quot;Water absorption&amp;quot; criterion with a significance level of p &amp;lt; 0.01. There were no statistical differences in the criterion of &amp;quot;Water absorption&amp;quot; between Vita CAD-Temp material, Re-Fine Bright plastic and Protemp 4 material. The water absorption rates for Protemp 4 were significantly lower compared to the ReFine Bright plastic (the median samples differ by 37,4 %, p &amp;lt; 0,0083). The samples made of photopolymer resin for the NextDent C&amp;amp;B MFH 3D printer had the highest water absorption value (the median of the sample was greater than the median of the groups &amp;quot;Protemp 4&amp;quot; by 61.1 %, that of &amp;quot;ReFine Bright&amp;quot; by 37.7&amp;nbsp;%, and that of &amp;quot;Vita CAD-Temp&amp;quot; by 51.8 %, p &amp;lt; 0.0083).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>water absorption</kwd><kwd>reconstruction</kwd><kwd>provisional fixed dentures</kwd><kwd>3D printer</kwd><kwd>ReFine Bright</kwd><kwd>Protemp 4</kwd><kwd>Vita CAD-Temp</kwd><kwd>Next Dent C&amp;B MFH</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>water absorption</kwd><kwd>reconstruction</kwd><kwd>provisional fixed dentures</kwd><kwd>3D printer</kwd><kwd>ReFine Bright</kwd><kwd>Protemp 4</kwd><kwd>Vita CAD-Temp</kwd><kwd>Next Dent C&amp;B MFH</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Vasilyeva E.D., Vasilyeva A.A., Kychkin A.A. 2022.&amp;nbsp; On the Methods of Studying the Impact of Moisture on Polymeric Composite Materials. Materialovedenie. E`nergetika. (28)1: 21&amp;ndash;31. doi: 10.18721/JEST.28102 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>GOST R 56924-2016 (ISO 4049:2009). Dentistry. Polymer-Based Restorative Materials. Date of Introduction 01.06.2017 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Lebedenko I.Yu., Arutyunov S.D., Ryaxovskij A.N. 2022. Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya: nacional`noe rukovodstvo [Prosthodontics: National Guidelines]. Tom 2, 2-e izd. pererab. i dop. M., GE`OTAR-Media, 416.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Ryaxovskij A.N. 2010. Cifrovaya stomatologiya [Digital Dentistry]. M., OOO &amp;laquo;Avantis&amp;raquo;, 282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Stomatov A.V., Stomatov D.V., Ivanov P.V., Marchenko V.V., Piitsky E.V., Umarataev S.U. 2020. Comparative Characteristics of Provisional Crowns Made by CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing. Stomatology for All, 2: 45&amp;ndash;49. doi: 10.35556/idr-2020-2(91)45-49 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Alam M., Chugh A., Kumar A., Rathee M., Jain P. 2022. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Anterior Provisional Restorations Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Techniques &amp;ndash; An in vitro Study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 22(4): 361&amp;ndash;367. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_547_21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Ellakany P., Fouda S.M., AlGhamdi M.A., Aly N.M. 2023. Comparison of the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of 3-Unit Provisional Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated by Milling, Conventional and Different 3D Printing Fabrication Techniques. Journal of Dentistry 131: 104458. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300571223000453?via%3Dihub (accessed 10&amp;nbsp;February 2025). doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Firlej M., Pieniak D., Niewczas A.M., Walczak A., Domagała I., Borucka A., Przystupa K., Igielska-Kalwat&amp;nbsp;J., Jarosz W., Biedziak B. 2021. Effect of Artificial Aging on Mechanical and Tribological Properties of CAD/CAM Composite Materials Used in Dentistry. Materials (Basel). 14(16): 4678. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/16/4678 (accessed 10 February 2025). doi: 10.3390/ma14164678</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Imai H., Koizumi H., Hiraba H., Kiuchi K., Matsumura H., Yoneyama T. 2024. Depth of Cure, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Indirect Composites Polymerized by Light-Emitting Diode Laboratory Units. Dental Materials Journal. 43(4): 559&amp;ndash;564. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2023-260</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Imirzalioglu P., Karacaer O., Yilmaz B., Msc I.O. 2010. Color Stability of Denture Acrylic Resins and a Soft Lining Material Against Tea, Coffee, and Nicotine. Journal of Prosthodontics. 19(2): 118&amp;ndash;124. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00535.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Jain S., Sayed M.E., Shetty M., Alqahtani S.M., Al Wadei M.H.D., Gupta S.G., Othman A.A.A., Alshehri&amp;nbsp;A.H., Alqarni H., Mobarki A.H., Motlaq K., Bakmani H.F., Zain A.A., Hakami A.J., Sheayria&amp;nbsp;M.F. 2022. Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers (Basel). 14(13): 2691. doi: 10.3390/polym14132691</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Labban N., AlSheikh R., Lund M., Matis B.A., Moore B.K., Cochran M.A., Platt J.A. 2021. Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials. Polymers (Basel). (13)17: 28&amp;ndash;51. doi: 10.3390/polym13172851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>M&amp;acirc;rțu I., Murariu A., Baciu E.R., Savin C.N., Foia I., Tatarciuc M., Diaconu-Popa D. 2022. An Interdisciplinary Study Regarding the Characteristics of Dental Resins Used for Temporary Bridges. Medicina (Kaunas). 58(6): 811. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/6/811 (accessed 10 February 2025). doi: 10.3390/medicina58060811</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>&amp;Ouml;zt&amp;uuml;rk A.N.S., Harorli O.T. 2024. Bulk-Fill Composite in Challenging Cavities: Conversion Rate, Solubility, and Water Absorption Analysis. Odontology. 12(3): 718&amp;ndash;728. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00873-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Pantea M., Ciocoiu R.C., Greabu M., Ripszky Totan A., Imre M., Ț&amp;acirc;ncu A.M.C., Sfeatcu R., Sp&amp;icirc;nu T.C., Ilinca&amp;nbsp;R., Petre A.E. 2022. Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Comparison. Materials (Basel).15(9): 3075. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/9/3075 (accessed 10 February 2025). doi: 10.3390/ma15093075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Rayyan M.M., Aboushelib M., Sayed N.M., Ibrahim A., Jimbo R. 2015. Comparison of Interim Restorations Fabricated by CAD/CAM with those Fabricated Manually. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 114(3): 414&amp;ndash;419. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Sayed M.E., Jain S., Jokhadar H.F., Alshahrani A.A., AlResayes S.S., Alqahtani S.M., Alqarni H., Anab N.A., Alsubeaie N.H., Alsubaie S.H., Khalid A., Franco R., Minervini G. 2024. Effect of Smokeless Tobacco on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Conventional Provisional Crown and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Materials: An in vitro Study. Technology and Health Care. 32(3): 1697&amp;ndash;1711. doi: 10.3233/THC-230723</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Shin J.W., Kim J.E., Choi Y.J., Shin S.H., Nam N.E., Shim J.S., Lee K.W. 2020. Evaluation of the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Crown and Bridge Materials against Various Sources of Discoloration: An in vitro Study. Materials (Basel). 13(23): 53&amp;ndash;59. doi: 10.3390/ma13235359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Shishehian A., Firouz F., Khazaee S., Rajabi H., Farhadian M., Niaghiha F. 2023. Evaluating the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Resins against Various Solutions. European Journal of Translational Myology. 33(3):&amp;nbsp;11493. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372145660_Evaluating_the_color_stability_of_3D-printed_resins_against_various_solutions. (accessed 10 February 2025). doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2023.11493</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Zafar M.S. 2020.Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers (Basel). 12(10): 2299. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2299 (accessed 10 February 2025). doi: 10.3390/polym12102299</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>