<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2687-0940</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Challenges in modern medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0940</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52575/2687-0940-2025-48-1-79-87</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">232</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>STOMATOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative Analysis of Modern Techniques for Finishing Composite Restorations Using a Dental Microscope&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative Analysis of Modern Techniques for Finishing Composite Restorations Using a Dental Microscope&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Vinnik</surname><given-names>Anastasia V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vinnik</surname><given-names>Anastasia V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>v2l3y4a@gmail.com</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>Nikolay V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>Nikolay V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Vinnik</surname><given-names>Sergei V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vinnik</surname><given-names>Sergei V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Paygina</surname><given-names>Valentina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Paygina</surname><given-names>Valentina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/journal-medicine/2025/1/АПМ_т.48_1_2025_79-87.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The most important stage in sealing with composite materials is finishing, which determines the durability, strength, and aesthetics of the restoration. Currently, there are many modern polishing tools that meet various requirements. The aim of the article is to provide a comparative analysis of modern systems for finishing composite restorations. During the study, we used the Estelite Quick and EsCom nanocomposites, from which 16 samples were prepared. All samples were divided into four groups for finishing, where: group 1 was not subjected to any treatment, being used as a control one; group 2 consisted of grinding discs No. НК 1.020 (&amp;ldquo;ТОР ВМ&amp;rdquo;, Moscow); group 3 consisted of Enhance Dentsply polishing heads (UK); group 4 was represented with Opti 1 Step Polisher Kerr polishing system (USA). A coloring agent was also used to evaluate the polishing quality. The surface condition of the samples was studied using a Karl Kaps dental microscope. Analysis of the photographs has shown that the samples in the first group have an uneven structure and a rough surface with defects, the samples in the second group have a more even surface, but there are scratches and colored pores, the samples in the third group have areas with coloring and a surface with streaks, the samples in the fourth group have the smoothest surface and shine. Analyzing the quality of finishing using a microscope, we can conclude that the polishing head from the Opti 1 Step Polisher Kerr system showed the best result.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The most important stage in sealing with composite materials is finishing, which determines the durability, strength, and aesthetics of the restoration. Currently, there are many modern polishing tools that meet various requirements. The aim of the article is to provide a comparative analysis of modern systems for finishing composite restorations. During the study, we used the Estelite Quick and EsCom nanocomposites, from which 16 samples were prepared. All samples were divided into four groups for finishing, where: group 1 was not subjected to any treatment, being used as a control one; group 2 consisted of grinding discs No. НК 1.020 (&amp;ldquo;ТОР ВМ&amp;rdquo;, Moscow); group 3 consisted of Enhance Dentsply polishing heads (UK); group 4 was represented with Opti 1 Step Polisher Kerr polishing system (USA). A coloring agent was also used to evaluate the polishing quality. The surface condition of the samples was studied using a Karl Kaps dental microscope. Analysis of the photographs has shown that the samples in the first group have an uneven structure and a rough surface with defects, the samples in the second group have a more even surface, but there are scratches and colored pores, the samples in the third group have areas with coloring and a surface with streaks, the samples in the fourth group have the smoothest surface and shine. Analyzing the quality of finishing using a microscope, we can conclude that the polishing head from the Opti 1 Step Polisher Kerr system showed the best result.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Finishing</kwd><kwd>composite restoration</kwd><kwd>polishing disks</kwd><kwd>polishing head</kwd><kwd>polishers</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Finishing</kwd><kwd>composite restoration</kwd><kwd>polishing disks</kwd><kwd>polishing head</kwd><kwd>polishers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Vinnik A.V. 2022. The Role of Microorganisms in the Development of Chronic Gingivitis. Astrakhan Medical Journal. 17(4): 8&amp;ndash;15 (in Russian). doi: 10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.8.15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Glebova D.A., Nikolaev A.I. 2020. Laboratory Study of the Polishability of Dental Composite Restorative Materials. Smolensk Medical Almanac. 3: 64&amp;ndash;66 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Dmitrakova N.R., Tarasova Ju.G., Maslennikova G.A. 2020. Selecting a Polishing System for Finishing Microhybrid and Nanofilled Composites. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 138&amp;ndash;143 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Dju A.P., Kutlakaev R.S., Oganjan S.S., Borisov V.V. 2019. Finishing of Composite Restorations. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 35&amp;ndash;36 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kovalevsky A.M., Vorobieva Yu.B., Malysheva D.D. 2021. Restoration of Teeth Based on the Concept of &amp;laquo;Pre-Polishing of the Composite Dentin Layer. Pulse. 24(4) (in Russian). doi: 10.26787-nydha-2686-6838-2022-24-4-28-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Lyamin A.V., Vinnik A.V., Postnikov M.A., Vinnik S.V., Popov N.V., Alekseev D.V. 2024. Dental and Microbiological Status of COVID-19 Convalescent Patients with Simple Marginal Gingivitis. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity 14(2): 306&amp;ndash;312 (in Russian). doi: 10.15789/2220- 7619-DAM-17588</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Malysheva D.D., Vorobieva Yu.B., Kovalevsky A.M. 2022. Finishing of Composite Restorations of Teeth. Comparative Characteristics of Polishing Systems. Pulse. 24(4): 28&amp;ndash;32 (in Russian). doi: 10.26787-nydha-2686-6838-2022-24-4-28-32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Ovcharenko E.S., Severina T.V., Melekhov S.V. 2018. Microbiological and Experimental Analysis of the Surface of a Composite Restoration after Treatment with Various Polishing Systems in Patients with Inflammatory Periodontal Diseases. Medical Alphabet. 4(34): 27&amp;ndash;30 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Severina T.V., Ovcharenko E.S. 2018. Features of Dental Biofilm Growth Depending on the Quality of the Final Surface Processing of Composite Restoration. Periodontology. 24(4): 48&amp;ndash;54 (in Russian). doi: 10.25636/PMP.1.2018.4.9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Severina T.V., Ovcharenko E.S. 2016. Comparative Analysis of the Use of Polishing Systems to Achieve the Effect of &amp;laquo;Dry Light&amp;raquo; of the Finished Restoration from a Light Curing Composite Material. Clinical Dentistry. 3(79): 16&amp;ndash;20 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Tokmakova S.I., Lunitsyna Yu.V., Bondarenko O.V., Mokrenko E.V., Rekel O.V. 2021. Laboratory Evaluation of the Surface of a Nanofilled Composite Treated with Various Modern Polishing Systems. Clinical Dentistry. 24(2): 16&amp;ndash;22 (in Russian). doi: 10.37988/1811- 153X_2021_2_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Uspenskaya O.A., Spiridonova S.A.1, Levunina K.S. 2023. The Influence of the Abrasiveness of the Polishing System on the Quality of Composite Restoration. Saleev R.A. Collection of Scientific Papers Dedicated to the Founder of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of KSMU, Professor Isaac Mikhailovich Oxman. Kazan State Medical University (Kazan). 777&amp;ndash;781 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Uspenskaya O.A., Nikulicheva L.Ya., Shevchenko E.A., Klochkova V.E. 2024. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Polishing Pastes Used in Teeth Whitening.&amp;nbsp;Endodontics Today. 22(1): 86&amp;ndash;92 (in Russian).&amp;nbsp;doi: 10.36377/ET-0002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Amaya-Pajares S.P., Koi K., Watanabe H., da Costa J.B., Ferracane J.L. 2022. Development and Maintenance of Surface Gloss of Dental Composites after Polishing and Brushing: Review of the Literature.&amp;nbsp;J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 34(1): 15&amp;ndash;41. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12875.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Khan A., Hodson N., Altaie A. 2024. Polishing Systems for Modern Aesthetic Dental Materials: A Narrative Review.&amp;nbsp;Br. Dent. J. 237(8): 607&amp;ndash;613. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7963-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kobayashi M., Koi K., Wiskoski S., Watanabe H., Lewis S., Ferracane J.L. 2023. Isolated Effect of Filler Particle Size on Surface Properties of Experimental Resin Composites before and after Toothbrush Abrasion. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 35(8): 1286&amp;ndash;1292. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Lassila L., S&amp;auml;ilynoja E., Prinssi R., Vallittu P.K., Garoushi S. 2020. The Effect of Polishing Protocol on Surface Gloss of Different Restorative Resin Composites. Biomater. Investig. Dent. 7(1): 1&amp;ndash;8. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1708201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Shalini Devlukia, Lucy Hammond, Khalid Malik. 2023 Is Surface Roughness of Direct Resin Composite Restorations Material And Polisher-Dependent? A Systematic Review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 35(6): 947&amp;ndash;967. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Wheeler J., Deb S., Millar B.J. 2020. Evaluation of the Effects of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Dental Composite Resin. Br. Dent. J. 228(7): 527&amp;ndash;532. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1370-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Yu P., Yang S.M., Xu Y.X., Wang X.Y. 2022. Surface Roughness and Gloss Alteration of Polished Resin Composites with Various Filler Types after Simulated Toothbrush Abrasion. J. Dent. Sci. 18(3): 1016&amp;ndash;1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.12.004</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>