<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2687-0940</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Challenges in modern medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0940</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52575/2687-0940-2024-47-2-192-198</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">193</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>STOMATOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Dental Rehabilitation of Patients with Extreme Resorption of the Alveolar Process of the Upper Jaw with the Use of Zygomatic Implantation&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Dental Rehabilitation of Patients with Extreme Resorption of the Alveolar Process of the Upper Jaw with the Use of Zygomatic Implantation&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Balan</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Balan</surname><given-names>Vyacheslav A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>balanslavik888@gmail.com</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Rusakova</surname><given-names>Elena Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rusakova</surname><given-names>Elena Y.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lyakh</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lyakh</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bukov</surname><given-names>Denis O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bukov</surname><given-names>Denis O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chependyuk</surname><given-names>Tatyana A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chependyuk</surname><given-names>Tatyana A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/journal-medicine/2024/2/АПМ_2024_192-198.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The innovative method of zygomatic implantation is a rational method of dental rehabilitation for extreme resorption of the alveolar ridge. However, like any method, it is associated with certain disadvantages. These include: difficult surgical access requiring significant experience, risk of orbital injury, prolonged speech dysfunction, postoperative sinusitis, oroantral fistula, periorbital and conjunctival hematoma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long&amp;ndash;term results of maxillofacial and dental rehabilitation using zygomatic implantation. A comparative analysis of the obtained data revealed a significantly lower frequency of early postoperative complications with the use of zygomatic implantation 3 (2,6&amp;nbsp;% p = 0,112) compared with classical implantation 8 (11,5&amp;nbsp;% p &amp;lt; 0,002). There were no cases of zygomatic implants rejection, unlike traditional implantation, 8 (11,5&amp;nbsp;% p &amp;lt; 0,002). Conclusion. Rehabilitation of patients with extreme alveolar process resorption using zygomatic implants has shown high efficiency, with a significantly lower frequency of local complications and fewer lost implants compared with traditional implantation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The innovative method of zygomatic implantation is a rational method of dental rehabilitation for extreme resorption of the alveolar ridge. However, like any method, it is associated with certain disadvantages. These include: difficult surgical access requiring significant experience, risk of orbital injury, prolonged speech dysfunction, postoperative sinusitis, oroantral fistula, periorbital and conjunctival hematoma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long&amp;ndash;term results of maxillofacial and dental rehabilitation using zygomatic implantation. A comparative analysis of the obtained data revealed a significantly lower frequency of early postoperative complications with the use of zygomatic implantation 3 (2,6&amp;nbsp;% p = 0,112) compared with classical implantation 8 (11,5&amp;nbsp;% p &amp;lt; 0,002). There were no cases of zygomatic implants rejection, unlike traditional implantation, 8 (11,5&amp;nbsp;% p &amp;lt; 0,002). Conclusion. Rehabilitation of patients with extreme alveolar process resorption using zygomatic implants has shown high efficiency, with a significantly lower frequency of local complications and fewer lost implants compared with traditional implantation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>zygomatic implantation</kwd><kwd>extreme resorption</kwd><kwd>dental implants</kwd><kwd>osseointegration</kwd><kwd>prosthetics</kwd><kwd>rehabilitation</kwd><kwd>maxillary sinus</kwd><kwd>quality of life</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>zygomatic implantation</kwd><kwd>extreme resorption</kwd><kwd>dental implants</kwd><kwd>osseointegration</kwd><kwd>prosthetics</kwd><kwd>rehabilitation</kwd><kwd>maxillary sinus</kwd><kwd>quality of life</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The work was carried out without external sources of funding.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Paskova E.V., Markelova E.V., Golicyna A.A., Rusakova E.Yu. 2021. Patogeneticheskoe obosnovanie primeneniya rekombinantnyh interlejkinov u pacientov s perelomami chelyusti s celyu profilaktiki posttravmaticheskogo osteomielita [Pathogenetic Justification of the Use of Recombinant Interleukins in Patients with Jaw Fractures for the Prevention of Post-Traumatic Osteomyelitis]. Russian Journal of Immunology. 24(1): 23&amp;ndash;130. doi: 10.46235/1028-7221-979-PRF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Yugaj Yu.V., Tolmachev V.E., Markelova E.V., Golicyna A.A. 2013. Ocenka citokinovogo profilya u pacientov do i posle dentalnoj implantacii [Assessment of the Cytokine Profile in Patients Before and After Dental Implantation]. Pacific Medical Journal. 1: 31&amp;ndash;33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Sohrabi K., Esfandiari S., Mushantat A., Feine J. 2019. How Successful Are Small-Diameter Implants? A Literature Review. Clin. Oral. Implants. 23(5): 522&amp;ndash;528. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02410.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Borgonovo A., Grandi T., Vassallo S., Signorini L. Extrasinus. 2019. Zygomatic Implants for the Immediate Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: 1-Year Postloading Results from a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.&amp;nbsp;J. Oral Maxillofacial.&amp;nbsp;79(7): 356&amp;ndash;365.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Souza R.F., Ribeiro A.B., Vecchia M.P., Costa L., Cunha T.R., Reis A.C. 2018. Mini vs. Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Trial. J. Dent. 94(10): 1376&amp;ndash;1384. doi:10.1177/0022034515601959.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Supriya E., Vinay V., Andreas T. 2021. Basics of Dental Implantology for the Oral Surgeon. 4(23): 121&amp;ndash;167. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Flanagan D., Mascolo A. 2018. The Mini Dental Implant in Fixed and Removable Prosthetics: A Review. J. Oral. Implant. 39(1): 97&amp;ndash;132. doi: 10.1563/ AAID-JOI-D-10-00052.1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Merlin T., Tooher R., Weston A. 2019. Extending an Evidence Hierarchy to Include Topics Other than Treatment: Revising the Australian Levels of Evidence. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 7(2): 38&amp;ndash;40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Rostom D.A., Al-Fahd A. 2018. Mini Dental Implant Over Denture as an Alternative Treatment. Int. Dent. Med. J. Adv. 12(3): 2&amp;ndash;8. doi: 10.15713/ins.idmjar.77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Jofr&amp;eacute; J., Conrady Y., Carrasco C. 2018. Survival of Splinted Mini-Implants after Contamination with Stainless Steel. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. 34(1): 358&amp;ndash;377.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Temizel S., Bourauel C., Dirk C., Hasan I. 2019. Clinical and Radiological Investigations of Mandibular Over Dentures Supported by Conventional or Mini-Dental Implants: A 2-Yearprospective Follow-Up Study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 121(2): 240&amp;ndash;249. doi:12.1016/j. prosdent.2016.07.022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Pe&amp;ntilde;arrocha-Diago M., Bernabeu-Mira J.C., Fern&amp;aacute;ndez-Ru&amp;iacute;z A., Aparicio C., Pe&amp;ntilde;arrocha-Oltra D. Bone. 2020. Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series.&amp;nbsp;Materials. 12(1): 310&amp;ndash;377.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Gracher A.H.P., Moura M.B., Peres P.D.S., Thom&amp;eacute; G., Padovan L.E.M., Trojan L.C. 2021. Full Arch Rehabilitation in Patients with Atrophic Upper Jaws with Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review.&amp;nbsp;Int. J. Implant Dent.&amp;nbsp;15(1): 21&amp;ndash;43.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>