2687-0940Challenges in modern medicine2687-094010.52575/2687-0940-2024-47-1-119-128188SURGERY<strong>Analysis of the Quality of Life of Patients with Morbid Obesity after Mini-Gastric Bypass</strong><strong>Analysis of the Quality of Life of Patients with Morbid Obesity after Mini-Gastric Bypass</strong>KalinichenkoAnatoliy A.KalinichenkoAnatoliy A.akalinik@gmail.comKlimashevichAlexander V.KlimashevichAlexander V.klimashevich78@mail.ruFeoktistovYaroslav E.FeoktistovYaroslav E.VasilievAlexandr P.VasilievAlexandr P.LebedevVladimir A.LebedevVladimir A.MaksyutaElena S.MaksyutaElena S.KalinichenkoAnna A.KalinichenkoAnna A.202447100

Background. The problem of obesity is becoming more and more urgent every year. Because of this, bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly popular. Objective: to assess the quality of life of obese patients after mini-gastric surgery with a biliopancreatic loop length of 150 and 180 cm. Materials and methods. Patients after mini-gastric surgery were divided into two groups depending on the length of the biliopancreatic loop. Bariatric surgery was assessed according to BAROS. Results. For the first component of BAROS, the average score in group I was 2.15 and 2.13 in group II of patients. The average score for the 2nd component of BAROS was 2.16 points in group I and 2.05 in group II of patients. The average score for the third component in group I was 2.42 versus 2.02 points in group II of patients. Conclusions. Thus, when comparing the results for the three components of the BAROS bariatric analysis reporting and evaluation system, a higher quality of life score was obtained in the group of patients who underwent mini-gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic loop length of 150 cm.

Background. The problem of obesity is becoming more and more urgent every year. Because of this, bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly popular. Objective: to assess the quality of life of obese patients after mini-gastric surgery with a biliopancreatic loop length of 150 and 180 cm. Materials and methods. Patients after mini-gastric surgery were divided into two groups depending on the length of the biliopancreatic loop. Bariatric surgery was assessed according to BAROS. Results. For the first component of BAROS, the average score in group I was 2.15 and 2.13 in group II of patients. The average score for the 2nd component of BAROS was 2.16 points in group I and 2.05 in group II of patients. The average score for the third component in group I was 2.42 versus 2.02 points in group II of patients. Conclusions. Thus, when comparing the results for the three components of the BAROS bariatric analysis reporting and evaluation system, a higher quality of life score was obtained in the group of patients who underwent mini-gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic loop length of 150 cm.

bariatric surgerygastric bypassmini-gastric bypassBAROSquality of lifebiliopancreatic loopbariatric surgerygastric bypassmini-gastric bypassBAROSquality of lifebiliopancreatic loop

The work was carried out without external sources of funding.

Список литературыDedov I.I., Mel&rsquo;nichenko G.A., Shestakova M.V. et al. 2018. Russian National Clinical Recommendations for Morbid Obesity Treatment in Adults. 3rd Revision (Morbid Obesity Treatment in Adults). Obesity And Metabolism, 15(1): 53&ndash;70 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14341/omet2018153-70Ospanov O.B., Eleuov G.A., Bekmurzinova F.K. 2020. Gastric Bypass Surgery in Modern Bariatric Surgery. Obesity and Metabolism, 17(2): 130&ndash;137 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.14341/omet10161Almalki O.M., Lee W.J., Chen J.C., Ser K.H., Lee Y.C., Chen S.C. 2018. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes. Surg, 28(4): 970&ndash;975. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0.Arterburn D.E., Courcoulas A.P. Bariatric Surgery for Obesity and Metabolic Conditions in Adults. BMJ. 2014 Aug 27; 349: g3961. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3961Baltasar A. On BAROS. Bariatic Analysis and Reporting Outcome System. Obes. Surg. 1999 Jun; 9(3): 288. doi: 10.1381/096089299765553214.Castanha C.R., Tcbc-Pe &Aacute;.A.B.F., Castanha A.R., Belo G.Q.M.B., Lacerda R.M.R., Vilar L. Evaluation of Quality of Life, Weight Loss and Comorbidities of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2018 Jul 16; 45(3): e1864. Portuguese, English. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181864.Fehervari M., Fadel M.G., Alghazawi L.O.K., Das B., Rodr&iacute;guez-Luna M.R., Perretta S., Wan A., Ashrafian H. Medium-Term Weight Loss and Remission of Comorbidities Following Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes. Surg. 2023 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06778-xKassir R., Debs T., Blanc P. et al. 2016. Complications of Bariatric Surgery: Presentation and Emergency Management. Int. J. Surg., 27: 77&ndash;81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.067Lee W.J., Wang W., Lee Y.C., Huang M.T., Ser K.H., Chen J.C. Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass: Experience with Tailored Bypass Limb According to Body Weight. Obes Surg. 2008 Mar; 18(3): 294&ndash;9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9367-9. Epub 2008 Jan 12.Mahawar K.K., Himpens J., Shikora S.A., Chevallier J.M., Lakdawala M., De Luca M., Weiner R., Khammas A., Kular K.S., Musella M., Prager G., Mirza M.K., Carbajo M., Kow L., Lee W.J., Small P.K. The First Consensus Statement on One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Using a Modified Delphi Approach. Obes. Surg. 2018 Feb; 28(2): 303&ndash;312. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3070-2Małczak P., Mizera M., Lee Y., Pisarska-Adamczyk M., Wysocki M., Bała M.M., Witowski J., Rubinkiewicz M., Dudek A., Stefura T., Torbicz G., Tylec P., Gajewska N., Vongsurbchart T., Su&nbsp;M., Major P., Pędziwiatr M. 2021. Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. Obes Surg, 31(12): 5213&ndash;5223. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1. Epub 2021 Oct 11.Moorehead M.K., Ardelt-Gattinger E., Lechner H., Oria H.E. The Validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes. Surg. 2003 Oct; 13(5): 684&ndash;92. doi: 10.1381/096089203322509237Musella M., Berardi G., Velotti N., Schiavone V., Manetti C., Vitiello A. Safety and Efficacy of OAGB/MGB During the Learning Curve: Setting a Benchmark in a Bariatric Center of Excellence. Updates Surg. 2023 Jan; 75(1): 169&ndash;174. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PMID: 36169887Pai M.P., Paloucek F.P. 2000. The Origin of the &quot;Ideal&quot; Body Weight Equations. Ann. Pharmacother, 34(9): 1066&ndash;9. doi: 10.1345/aph.19381Poublon N., Chidi I., Bethlehem M., Kuipers E., Gadiot R., Emous M., van Det M., Dunkelgrun M., Biter&nbsp;U., Apers J. 2020. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Remedy for Insufficient Weight Loss and Weight Regain after Failed Restrictive Bariatric Surgery. Obes. Surg, 30(9): 3287&ndash;3294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x. Erratum in: Obes. Surg. May 8; PMID: 32307669Robert M., Espalieu P., Pelascini E., Caiazzo R., Sterkers A., Khamphommala L., Poghosyan T., Chevallier J.M., Malherbe V., Chouillard E., Reche F., Torcivia A., Maucort-Boulch D., Bin-Dorel&nbsp;S., Langlois-Jacques C., Delaunay D., Pattou F., Disse E. 2019. Efficacy and Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity (YOMEGA): a Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial. Lancet, 393(10178): 1299&ndash;1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Mar 30; 393(10178): 1298.Rutledge R., Kular K., Manchanda N. The Mini-Gastric Bypass Original Technique. Int. J. Surg. 2019 Jan; 61: 38&ndash;41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 24Rutledge R. The Mini-Gastric Bypass: Experience with the First 1,274 Cases. Obes. Surg. 2001 Jun; 11(3): 276&ndash;80. doi: 10.1381/096089201321336584Salminen P., Gr&ouml;nroos S., Helmi&ouml; M., Hurme S., Juuti A., Juusela R., Peromaa-Haavisto P., Leivonen M., Nuutila P., Ovaska J. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss, Comorbidities, and Reflux at 10 Years in Adult Patients With Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022 Aug 1; 157(8): 656&ndash;666. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2229Sierżantowicz R., Ładny J.R., Lewko J. Quality of Life after Bariatric Surgery-A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2022 Jul 26; 19(15): 9078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159078